Ok! First question: *This Pokémon can only have one ability, not counting hidden abilities. (type isn't going to be a clue, i'm warning you in advance, but by the end of these it should be really easy to guess anyway. and the last clue is type-related.)
I already said earlier and its one of the rules of the game that mentioning the type of the Pokémon is a requirement. Please follow the rules of the game.
It really shouldnt be a requirement. In some cases, like this one, it makes it way to easy. If I said the type, by the end its narrowed down to literally one Pokémon no matter what. If I do the clues I had in mind, it gets narrowed to about...well, ok, one, but in a less obvious way. If I really have to say the type, then get somebody else to be the cluegiver.
I only half-agree with your rule, @Cherry3Fairy. The type should be a requirement, but not necessarily in the first hint. Also, Squidy, is it ?
Okay. I'm kind enough to listen to my game players' point of views. Take a look at the rules. But still, the type must be mentioned in the clues!
Every game here has its own rules which are made by the creators of each game. Rules aren't supposed to be changed frequently at the wish of the players. Those rules are for all those who play the game including the creator. And I follow them. All those who play the game are supposed to follow them, yes? Yes! Squidy, if you can't follow the rules, please kindly leave the game. I don't intend to dissapoint you, mate, keep that in mind.
Alright, heck with it. I'm out. Here were the other clues: *In Gen V it had no weaknesses. *It only has one type. And the answer was Eelektross. Welp, I'm not being the cluegiver ever again.
The rule of saying the type was not in the original rules. It was completely optional. The first post was "Last edited: Sunday at 1:05 AM," and ^This^ happened on: "Saturday at 8:08 AM". Today is Tuesday. ^This^ happened on "Saturday at 9:52 AM", meaning the first post was edited since this reply was made. Not only is the rule incredibly dumb, but @Squidy822 had no idea that it existed. Also, Squidy makes a great point: @Cherry3Fairy, you changed the rules based on the time stamps' evidence. According to this quote, "Rules aren't supposed to be changed frequently at the wish of the players." This should include the creator; once the game is established, don't change it unless someone is abusing some mechanic or loophole, which Squidy obviously wasn't. You followed the rules by technicality since you changed them to your liking. Given the prior information, I believe Squidy is perfectly justified in their response: Also, Squidy was just following your suggestion: "Squidy, if you can't follow the rules, please kindly leave the game." To this, Cherry responds: If anyone is being rude here, Cherry, it's you. The unasked for defense attorney has spoken. Also, Snorunt.
